{"id":1266,"date":"2018-03-15T12:02:35","date_gmt":"2018-03-15T11:02:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/?p=1266"},"modified":"2018-03-15T12:02:35","modified_gmt":"2018-03-15T11:02:35","slug":"the-cheating-bug","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/2018\/03\/15\/the-cheating-bug\/","title":{"rendered":"The Cheating Bug"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201c<\/span>If you don’t get caught, you did the job right<\/span><\/i>\u201d (1) – a statement by a senior high school student in one of the surveys mentioned\u00a0 in the book \u201cCheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it<\/span>\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/i>by McCabe, Butterfield and Trevi\u00f1o. It might as well illustrate the attitude with which can lead to a later scientific misconduct in the universities. As a lecturer or thesis supervisor you are trained to recognise what a scientific misconduct is and what you should \u00a0do when you spot it. A lot of time and energy is used on preventing this undesirable cheating behaviour. This behaviour is neither ethical nor moral and can have great consequences in the future. Without a doubt, the young people of today are our future leaders of tomorrow (1).<\/p>\n

But have you ever wondered what brings the students to cheat? If we do not properly understand why the cheating happens and which motivation or culture lies behind this behaviour, the scientific misconduct cannot be efficiently prevented. There are many different opinions. The topic of scientific misconduct and cheating caught my eye after watching a TED talk by behavioral economist Dan Ariely \u201c Our buggy moral code\u201d (2). It was interesting to realise which simple things brought the test subjects in the studies he mentions to cheat – and which genuinely simple tricks prevented it. His observations are in line with the findings by McCabe, Butterfield and Trevi\u00f1o. Their research is concentrated on the cheating and scientific misconduct in American Universities. It includes some country specific factors that might increase the tendency to cheat (e.g. membership in fraternities or sororities) and topics that could be discussed more (e.g. role of gender and of the type of subjects the students study). But there are also some useful findings that we might take from this book. As the authors state, it is very possible that the students\u00b4 cheating behaviour evolves long before they start to attend the university (1). High pressure to perform well during their studies might easily lead to cheating. The prospective profit in the form of good grades or better academic performance simply overrides the inner and outer barriers for cheating. What’s more, they might learn from their surroundings \u201c<\/span>that cheating is acceptable<\/span><\/i>\u201d (1) if it is the tool to future success. As a consequence, the students described in the study copy from another student during an exam, use unpermitted materials or cheat notes and \u201cforget\u201d to mention the original author of the text in their papers (1). <\/span><\/p>\n

What might be done about this? The authors suggest that the condemnation of this behaviour by their peers, the leading by example of other students and especially the wide support of ethical behaviour – the \u201c<\/span>strong ethical environment<\/span><\/i>\u201d- might be the central keystones promoting the academic integrity (1). The \u201c<\/span>strong ethical environment<\/span><\/i>\u201d might be supported by the presence of the university’s honour code, but the existence of an honour code is not necessary (1). This statement is illustrated in a rather amusing way in the speech by Dan Ariely. He describes a situation where the study subjects (students) are reminded before the test to keep in mind the honour code of their university. The cheating rate in this group of students is then comparably lower than the cheating rate in the group where the honour code is not mentioned at all. Surprisingly, mentioning the honour code before the test worked even when there was never any honour code introduced at this university (2). <\/span><\/p>\n

So would it be enough to remind the students before writing an exam or a paper of the ten commandments as Dan Ariely suggests (2)? Should we now sit down and start to work on and promote the honour code of \u00c5bo Akademi? Or should we better try to cure this bug of cheating much earlier, before the students come to the university? <\/span><\/p>\n

References:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. MCCABE, D.L., BUTTERFIELD, K.D. and TREVINO, L.K.<\/span> Cheating in College: Why Students do it and what Educators can do about It. <\/span><\/i>JHU Press, 2012.<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. TEDTalks: Dan Ariely\u2014Dan Ariely on our Buggy Moral Code. <\/span><\/i>TED Conferences LLC. , 2009. Available from: https:\/\/www.ted.com\/talks\/dan_ariely_on_our_buggy_moral_code#t-11341 Films On Demand.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

     <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    \u201cIf you don’t get caught, you did the job right\u201d (1) – a statement by a senior high school student in one of the surveys mentioned\u00a0 in the book \u201cCheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it\u201d\u00a0\u00a0by McCabe, Butterfield and Trevi\u00f1o. It might as well illustrate the attitude with […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":576,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1266","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-unipeda-modul3"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1266","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/576"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1266"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1266\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1272,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1266\/revisions\/1272"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1266"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1266"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.abo.fi\/personalbloggen\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1266"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}